Periphery and Center,
reading Natalie Zemon Davis at Stern College for Women
Catalan Atlas by
Judah Crescas
I am teaching a new course this
semester at Stern College: Wanderers,
Exiles and Merchants: Jewish travel writing, medieval and early modern.
We start with the Radhanite
merchants and their global trade-network as described by a contemporary Muslim
geographer and then move on to Eldad the Danite’s tale of the lost tribes,
strong and free, in the Indies. Benjamin
of Tudela’s Itinerary gives us a
picture of Jewish life throughout the Mediterranean world and beyond but tells
us very little about the famous traveller (much to our regret); Yehuda Halevi’s
poems imagine his journey to Zion and stand as a rich counterpoint to his poems
written from tempest-tossed ships or while admiring the beauty of the Nile
delta- KeGan Hashem/Like God’s Garden! We read these Jewish writers in light of
Marco Polo and Ibn Batuta. We explore the world of the Cairo Geniza and its
intrepid merchants, European Jews on pilgrimage to the Holy Land, David Reuveni
the messianic messenger from beyond the Sambatyon river who comes to Rome with
a message from his brother the King of the lost Tribes and then we see how a
century later the Portuguese converso merchant Antonio Montezinos arrives in
Amsterdam telling of his journey to the kingdom of the Reubenites hiding in the
heart of the Andes. It’s a wild ride!
During one of my first classes I
was looking out at the room filled with bright and curious students, all women,
and the reality hit me: there are no women in this entire syllabus! Not only
are there no women authors, the texts we will read almost consistently elide
any mention of women in their travels with just a few exceptions scattered in
this vast sea of texts. I reached out to a friend and colleague who has thought
about this felt absence both in her scholarship and her teaching. Sarah Pearce
suggested I think about the Geniza as a resource because so many of the letters
between husbands and wives refer to the spouses’ travels. We read a great
article by Joel Kraemer weaving together a rich “itinerary” of letters and
other personal documents that opened up the world of Middle Eastern Jewish
women and pointed to the frenetic movement of people and goods throughout the Mediterranean.
The students were energized by this reading and it inspired some excellent
essays. Sarah also referred me to an interview with Natalie Zemon Davis where
she discusses her methodology and the challenges and opportunities at stake in
capturing the voices of those who left no clear testimony behind for historians
to unravel. In “’Being speculative is better than to not do it at all’: an
interview with Natalie Zemon Davis.” The ground breaking historian of the early
modern period talks about the challenge of reading the lives of people who left
behind a scant paper trail with two other historians of the early modern period
Jessica Roitman and Karwan Fatah-Black.[1] Zemon Davis reflects on her own approach to
listening in on the past and of filling in the empty space around marginal
figures who would otherwise be forgotten: women, the enslaved, Muslims, Jews,
peasants, etc. I paired this
theoretical piece with a short essay Zemon Davis wrote about the Surinamese
Sephardi man of letters David Nassy, his daughter and his (eventually freed)
slave Mattheus. The article follows Nassy from Suriname to his 3 year furlough
in Philadelphia in the 1790’s. Zemon Davis weaves archival documents with what
we can know about the places that Nassy and his household travel: the members
of Congegation Mikveh Israel in Philadelphia that he befriended, the rich
intellectual culture of Philadelphia that Nassy enjoyed and participated in,
the abolitionists and vibrant community of freed blacks that his manumitted but
still indentured slave Mattheus would have encountered on the streets. Without
any scrap of autobiographical material about Mattheus she tries to recreate the
world he inhabited and she charts out the contours of his intellectual and
social orbit. In the absence of reading his own words NZD paints the details
and texture of the possible interactions and experiences he would have had. NZD
discovers that Nassy and his servant held the ropes when the visiting French
avionist Jean Pierre Blanchard launched himself into the sky in a hot air
balloon on January 9 1793- we can only imagine what a strange and wondrous
sight this might have been for both Mattheus and Nassy and how this
extraordinary event and so many other things particular to Philadelphia might
have influenced master and slave as they returned to the Caribbean.
One student found the project
something of a swindle. Zemon Davis
presents conjecture as fact! Most women in class rejected this view. They were
drawn in to her story telling and appreciated her caution and careful
erudition. I believe that they were also inspired by her indefatigable
curiosity. We discussed her long career and her interest in the marginal as a
way for better understanding the center. I mentioned hearing
her give a talk at NYU last spring. At 88 she is clear, focused and energizing.
She is a great listener and mediated a very fiesty group of professors and
graduate students with elegance. She seems to feed off her discoveries and the
connections she finds. My students and I fed off that energy! One was taken by
the Zemon Davis’ excitement at finding a Creole dictionary. Another found
magical the way she tied disparate pieces together, with care and self-awareness
of the pitfalls and possibilities of this reconstruction. The original nay-sayer
was not persuaded but I thanked her for providing a spark to our discussion of
the essay.
I teach at a university where Jewish
studies is not marginal, it is at the center. However, to a great extent it is
through my students’ exploration of Jewish history that they discover world
history. Starting with themselves they move outwards. They encounter
Christianity and Islam as they trace the development of Jewish culture and
society from the late classical into the modern age. They encounter the harsh
realities of the slave trade by meeting a New World Sephardi who owns slaves
and who wrestles with the economic realities that make slave-owning so tempting
at the same time that he is moved b the ideals of abolition. We also read the
grand narratives against their grain to find the stories of the marginalized
and forgotten, the poor, women, heretics and misfits. So center and periphery
shift and the particular and the universal are ineluctably tied. Reading the
other is no simple matter because inevitably it brings us to see our selves in
a new light. History should return us to this imbalance, this frenetic and
generative dissonance between our comfortable assumptions and the yet unknown
and strange which can lead us to new knowledge and a deepening awareness of our
ever changing place in the world. Natalie
Zemon Davis is a great guide to this hermeneutical dance.
Jodensavanne, the “Jews’ Savannah” where Jews had large farms and employed slaves to
cultivate the land. The synagogue was the tallest building in the center of the
town. It can be made out in this image drawn from across the river.
[1] http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0165115315000108
Jessica Roitman and Karwan
Fatah-Black (2015). “Being speculative is better than to
not do it at all”: an interview with
Natalie Zemon Davis. Itinerario, 39, pp 3-15
doi:10.1017/S0165115315000108
No comments:
Post a Comment